Berkman@10 Conference at Harvard
Last Thursday and Friday I attended the Berkman@10 conference about the future of the Internet. The very short summary is there are a lot of really really smart people who are affiliated with the Berkman Center. :-)
Here's the longer version:
Day 1 was a series of presentations by both academics and business people, from Harvard to Oxford, from Wikipedia to MTV. The first to speak was Jonathan Zittrain, who I think collectively blew the audience's mind. His book, The Future of the Internet and How To Stop It (believe it or not, available in PDF), was the framework for the talk, where he talked about the fragility of the Internet's ability to stay afloat and presented a bottom-up approach to sustainability by having a core group of technical experts take on the "policing" of bad Internet behavior.
What was interesting was that it was followed up later in the day with a talk from the founder of Wikipedia, another great speaker. He really built on Zittrain's presentation, and talked about harnessing the power of community, which really isn't all that bad after all. Yes, there are bad apples, he exclaimed, but they get kicked out by the rest of the community, largely made up of people who are passionate about their area of interest and don't want to see it get messed up. He also presented the backbone of the site, which he believes has allowed it such success, the idea of a Neutral Point of View (as opposed to majority rule). He noted that if 70% think one thing is true and 30% think it's not, chances are there's something not quite right with th 70% either. They work it out online until reasonable language is presented. His example was that you can't say "Abortion is immoral", but you can say "the catholic church believes abortion is a sin", or something like that. You get the idea. :)
I think those two sessions did a nice job of convincing me, anyway, that there's hope for humankind when we can look at ways digital society as a community can act for good, not just surrender to spam and hacking.
Later in the day, some other heavy-hitters came in (Esther Dyson, a VP from MTV/Viacom and a former FCC chairman ) to talk more about the future of the Internet and the conversation varied widely. One of my favorite observations was the notion that the university will go the way of the newspaper. In essence, free education is the future. This isn't too surprising, since we're already seeing signs of this with MIT's open courseware and now Harvard's open access.
The tenor of this session, in fact really the whole conference, was Everything Should Be Open. Of course, that's not necessarily the best course of action, and every need is different, but it is interesting to see an institution that has been branded for hundreds of years as elitist, flinging its doors open (well, not completely,... yet. ;-)).
Day 2 was the "unconference" day, where I was moved to facilitate a session on Semantic Web. Because it was the end of the second day, I was assured that's why there weren't more people, but the group we did have was interesting. A managing editor for the NY Times was there, as well as a reporter from eWeek. The gist was everyone wanted to know more, but were skeptical of its full potential.
There was also another session on Digital Natives. One of the producers from the Frontline special Growing Up Online was there and articulated exactly what we're seeing... that the real digital divide is between teachers and students and these teachers aren't being given the tools to handle what is clearly a huge shift in learning. Overall people were mixed in their feelings on using technology in the classroom. Is it a distraction? Are there ways to use it as a learning tool to engage students in a new way? The latter, everyone felt, was possible, but still far from established. Berkman used a Question Tool throughout the conference, and displayed it behind each panel and session, so that the audience could ask questions, and other members of the audience could vote, so more popular ones would be addressed. I didn't have my laptop with me and found myself having trouble balancing reading comments and listening to the person speaking, but I'm no digital native!
Overall, I think the conference was really valuable. There's lots to chew on here and I'm still trying to sort it all out. This is some heady stuff.











The UK female entrepreneur is in her early 30s, tech savvy, well connected and thrives on risk, according to a survey by Aurora, the UK’s largest business women’s network. This network is owned by 
So recently it was brought to my attention that MentorSET have just recently launched their online mentoring system for women in the Science, Engineering and Technology industry. This is a great opportunity for anyone in the industry to link up with a mentor if they haven’t already. The program is currently open to anyone with a focus on females in Science, Engineering and Technology.

